Another good post

I read another good, well researched, moderate sounding post, which isn't unreaonably strident in its criticism of ZAP. There seems to be such a lot of shrill and raucous negative publicity happening over the internet in the recent past (as i have talked about in my earlier posts) it is enough to make anyone wonder if it is orchestrated in some way, whether it is designed to insidiously discredit and malign the efforts of ZAP. In the midst of this, this post here is a more coherent stating of facts, this time including ZAP's side of the story and not just flinging around a lot of wild and baseless accusations.